|
Rabbi Karp's Sermons ... THIS IS NOT JUST ANOTHER SHABBAT: LIVING IN TWO WORLDS A couple of years ago, Rabbi Eric Yoffie, the President of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, invited me to participate in an email group called “Rabbis On-Line.” This group is composed of a cross section of rabbis, to whom Rabbi Yoffie turns for counsel when considering new directions or policies for the Union. I share this with you because last May Rabbi Yoffie asked our group with the following question: “The secular New Year's Eve falls on Erev Shabbat this year. We have really been struggling with the question of whether or not we should offer some movement advice and direction on what should be done in our congregations. Some
suggestions and considerations that have arisen to date: 1.
Some lay leaders are suggesting that temples host some kind of New Year's
Eve party after services. While
this seems wildly inappropriate, it is at least being considered in some
cases. 2. Some suggest that we should do nothing. Neither the millennium nor New Year's Eve is a Jewish event, and therefore there is no reason for us to be involved in any way. 3.
Some suggest that since congregational attendance will certainly be
affected, and that since the millennium has stirred interest among our
congregants, we should consider offering some suggestions and perhaps some
materials to our synagogues. Among
the suggestions: a) We recommend an early service; b) We prepare some
texts/study materials on a Jewish view of the millennium, and distribute
them for study that evening; c) We consider this an occasion to reflect on
the meaning of Shabbat, and we prepare and distribute some study texts on
the meaning and celebration of Shabbat; d) We recommend a Shabbat dinner
prior to services; e) We prepare a special study guide on Shemot,
the portion for that Shabbat; f) We do a survey of congregations:
"Living in two worlds - how is your congregation dealing with Shabbat
on December 31," and then publish the results in the November issue of
Reform Judaism. I
would be grateful for your reactions to the above.” He
asked this question last May! Seven
months ago. What greater testimony
can there be to the tension which exists for us as Jews, and especially for us
as Reform Jews, as we struggle to live in this predominantly Christian society? Tonight
we are gathered to celebrate Shabbat, but how can we forget that it is Christmas
Eve? Next week, we will gather to
celebrate Shabbat, but how practical is it to expect us to ignore the fact that
it will be New Year’s Eve, nevertheless the millennial New Year’s Eve?
Tonight and tomorrow, more than any other time in the course of the year,
we feel what it means to be an outsider in American society.
Next Shabbat, more than most other times of the year, we will feel the
strain of two forces pulling at us - Shabbat - New Year’s; celebrate our
Judaism - celebrate our secularity. Of
course, there will be many in our Jewish community who will not feel that tug,
that strain. After all, they do not
feel it on any given Shabbat, nevertheless on the Shabbat which also happens to
be New Year’s Eve. But the fact
that they don’t feel it is not something for us as a community to be proud of.
They have not successfully balanced their two identities - their Jewish
identity and their American identity. Rather
they have surrendered their Jewish identity, or at least a greater part of their
Jewish identity, in their search for a comfort level within American society.
Choosing to live Jewishly only when it is convenient and when it
doesn’t get in the way is not, by any stretch of the imagination, successful
Jewish living. This
is not a new issue for our people. It
seems that throughout our history, more often than not, we have been forced to
walk this treacherous tightrope stretched between the culture that surrounds us
and our own Jewish culture. For the
last few weeks in the Torah we have been reading the story of Joseph. He is a perfect example.
Living in Egypt, as right hand man to Pharaoh, he became so Egyptian that
he even changed his Hebrew name to an Egyptian name, Tsafnat Paneach; he became
so Egyptian that his brothers could not even recognize him -there was no longer
anything Jewish about him, not even a physical family resemblance. Yes,
this is a recurring story in the life of our people.
And we have always been left with the same three options: (1) to permit
ourselves to be absorbed totally into the host society,
(2) to actively, and sometimes physically, resist any of the influences
of the host society, or (3) to struggle within ourselves to create of our lives
a healthy and dynamic balance between the two worlds. It
is believed that the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel were actually lost to the first
option. The Assyrians who conquered
and exiled them did not hide them in some remote corner of the world. Rather, they scattered them among other peoples, and
eventually they were totally assimilated by those people. Though
we don’t like to talk about it, the story of Hanukkah, the holiday which we so
love to celebrate, is really a story about the second option.
The villain, Antiochus Eppiphanes was an Hellenist, someone who
evangelically believed in the superiority of Greek culture.
He did everything in his power to spread that culture throughout his
empire. And many, many people,
including many, many Jews, gladly accepted it.
They took on Greek names, Greek clothes, Greek customs.
There were many who stopped circumcising their sons, and even had their
own foreskins surgically reconstructed because according to the Greeks, the body
is perfect and circumcision - the sign of the Jewish covenant with God -
destroys that perfection. Even
Mattathias’ parents gave their son a Greek name, for “Mattathias” is
Greek, not Hebrew. It was this
wholesale assimilation which Mattathias, his sons and his followers opposed. This is what they fought about.
We sanitize it when we call it a battle for religious freedom, but it
really was a war waged against assimilation.
There was not that much difference in mentality between our beloved
Mattathias and the Ayatollah Khoumeini, or at least between Mattathias and the
Lubavitcher Rebbe. The
story of our own movement, Reform Judaism, is truly the story of the third
option. In the beginning of the 19th
century, as Napoleon swept through Europe, like Antiochus, Napoleon was also a
cultural evangelist. The culture he
was promoting was the culture of the French Revolution; a culture founded upon
the principle that all people, regardless of birth or faith, are equal -
“Liberty! Equality!
Fraternity!” As an expression of those beliefs, he tore down the walls of
the ghettos in which the Jews had been confined and isolated from their
Christian neighbors, and he welcomed the Jews into general European society.
The transition into European society was not an easy one for our people.
It was the desire of most Jews to fit in and be welcomed.
However, for many, the practices of traditional Judaism represented
significant barriers to that goal. Such
customs as kashrut made it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for Jews to
successfully socially interact with non-Jews.
As a result of these tensions, many Jews converted to Christianity.
It was under these conditions that Reform Judaism arose.
It was unashamedly an attempt to create a form of Judaism which would
permit its people to live in both worlds; the world of their Jewish religion and
the world of their secular society. As
we gather here tonight in this synagogue, as Reform Jews, we are the heirs to
their religious revolution. We
also are the heirs to the challenges of that revolution.
The first two options - total assimilation or total opposition to
assimilation - are far easier choices than ours.
To just give up your Judaism or to close yourself off from the influences
of the outside world, both choices conveniently paint the world as black or
white. Both choices offer obvious
and clear cut decisions. But
not so with the balancing act which we have chosen to attempt.
We are constantly anguishing over the mix. Rabbi Yoffie’s question of last May is but another example
of that anguish. The unaffiliated
Jews of America are not struggling with that question.
They know where they are going to be on New Year’s Eve, and its not
going to be in synagogue. Likewise,
the ultra Orthodox Jews are not struggling with it. They, too, know what they are going to do next Shabbat, just
as they know what they are going to do every Shabbat. Only we, and our Conservative brothers and sisters, have
trouble drawing the lines. When
I was in Confirmation Class, 35 years ago (now that the world knows that I am
50, you can all do the math for yourselves), the big debate was, “Are we
American Jews or Jewish Americans?” It
all had to do with grammar. Which
is the noun? And which is the adjective?
What is our essential identity, and what is the modifier of that
identity? Are we Jews who happen to
be Americans, or Americans who happen to be Jews? Back
in 1973, when I was in rabbinical school, and when GATES OF PRAYER was first
published, we were still asking that same question, but we framed our dialogue
around the nature of the prayer book itself.
In each and every Reform synagogue, the debate was two fold.
First: Should we buy this prayer book with its increased tradition and
Hebrew or should we continue to worship with the old Union Prayer Book and its
primarily English service? Second:
If we choose to use GATES OF PRAYER, do we purchase the edition that opens in
the English direction or the one that opens in the Hebrew direction? The
discussion continues today within our movement.
Just last year, we were heavily debating the text of the then proposed
document, the “Ten Principles of Reform Judaism.”
We struggled, and still struggle, with such questions as: Kashrut, kipot,
talitot, tefilin - what place, if any, do these practices have within our
movement? Patrilineal descent,
matrilineal descent, Outreach, intermarriage, same sex marriage, how do we
define “Who is a Jew?” and who is welcomed into our synagogues?
In other words, how do we strike that balance between living in a modern,
secular world, with modern, secular values, while at the same time maintaining a
4,000 year old tradition of faith and peoplehood? Our
ambivalent feelings as we gather to celebrate Shabbat and our Jewish identity on
this Christmas Eve, and all that will go into our decision making as to whether
or not we will be here next Shabbat, on New Year’s Eve, are but pieces of the
same debate playing themselves out in our lives.
How Jewish are we? How
American are we? How can we
effectively stand in both worlds? You
ought to know that Rabbi Yoffie’s question had a life of its own beyond the
limited group who make up Rabbis On-Line. On
the Hebrew Union College Alumni list server - a forum for rabbis, cantors,
Jewish educators, Jewish social workers - the very same question was much
debated. Of course, there were
those who were quick to point out that this is not our millennium - ours is yet
another 240 years away - and therefore it should have no meaning at all for us.
There were plenty of those who said, “It’s Shabbat and nothing
more.” And all that sounded right
and good, in theory. But there were
those, myself included, who held that we do not live in theory.
We live in practice. And
practically speaking, though the New Year has nothing to do with us as Jews, it
has everything to do with us as Jews living in America.
We cannot ignore it but neither can we surrender to it. In the true spirit of our movement, we need to find a balance. We need to explore how it can be possible for us to live in both worlds. To that end, ours will be one of the many congregations which will be holding earlier services next Shabbat, followed by more elaborate onegs. We are encouraging our people to affirm the duality of our existence by observing Shabbat with their Jewish community before going on to celebrate New Year’s with their secular friends. For we believe that it need not be an “either/or” situation. We believe that people can do both. For that is what our Reform Judaism teaches us - that we can live in two worlds, and we can do so successfully. Amen |